Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

New research published today in Nature, led by DPAG scientists Dr Kristijan Jovanoski and Professor Scott Waddell at the Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, reveals dopamine systems can cause flies to seek reward despite negative consequences

The research team, which included DPAG DPhil student and second author Lucille Duquenoy, used optogenetics to activate a subset of reward-encoding dopamine neurons together with an odour. In the confocal microscopy image above, these dopaminergic neurons (in white) target the mushroom body (in blue), the centre of olfactory learning and memory in the fly brain. Prior work suggests that these dopamine neurons are highly diverse and ordinarily convey different reward types as parallel teaching signals to the mushroom body.  

Using optogenetic activation, the team discovered that they could generate olfactory associations that starved flies would seek while neglecting food or enduring electric shocks. This was not observed when flies were trained to associate an odour with the activation of other neurons in the brain or with a natural reward such as sugar.  

The researchers discovered that flies took risks to endure shock while seeking reward because the dopamine neurons that ordinarily signal electric shock punishment were functionally impaired by prior activation of the reward-encoding dopamine neurons. This revealed antagonism between reward-encoding and punishment-encoding dopamine neurons in the brain. 

 

Ordinarily, reward-encoding dopamine neurons are thought to send teaching signals to the mushroom body to reinforce olfactory associative learning. However, starved flies sought sugar less even after the reward-encoding dopamine neurons were activated in the absence of odour. This suggested that the dopamine neurons also convey satiety-like demotivational signals. 

Since flies ordinarily do not neglect food or endure shock to seek reward, the team reasoned that the activity of these dopamine neurons must ordinarily be tightly controlled. In the paper, the authors present physiological and anatomical evidence that this is indeed the case.  

Calcium imaging of these dopamine neurons using two-photon microscopy revealed that the dopamine neurons convey signals that are specific to both reward type and the physiological state of the fly. The researchers also observed calcium responses that resembled teaching signals and satiety-like signals in these neurons.  

Moreover, using the latest connectome data of the fly hemibrain, the authors found that the reward-encoding dopamine neurons (approximately 60 in total) receive inputs from over 1700 neurons from all over the brain (visualized in the connectome image below). This is over 25 times as many inputs, suggesting that these dopamine neurons have elaborate input controls. 

Anatomical reconstruction (from the fly hemibrain connectome) of over 1700 upstream neurons in the fly brain which target the approximately 60 dopamine neurons that drive reward seeking despite adverse consequences. Upstream neurons are coloured according to the various brain regions from which they emanate. Anatomical reconstruction (from the fly hemibrain connectome) of over 1700 upstream neurons in the fly brain which target the approximately 60 dopamine neurons that drive reward seeking despite adverse consequences. Upstream neurons are coloured according to the various brain regions from which they emanate.
 

With all this evidence, Professor Scott Waddell and Dr Kristijan Jovanoski propose that these heterogeneously rich reward-encoding dopamine neurons are ordinarily tightly controlled by upstream neurons that convey reward type and physiological state. Optogenetically activating these dopamine neurons bypasses their elaborate input control and destroys the reward-specificity and state-specificity of their signalling. Consequently, flies seek a non-specific reward that is greater than the sum of individual rewards, leading to supranormal reward seeking despite electric shocks or physiological needs. 

Given that there are many parallels between the dopamine neurons of flies and mammals, the authors propose that the mechanisms discovered here may similarly apply towards understanding compulsive reward-seeking behaviour and addiction in mammals. 

The full paper ‘Dopaminergic systems create reward seeking despite adverse consequences’ is available to read in Nature