Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Studies show that the main system of hospital reimbursement in the UK National Health Service (NHS), Payment by Results, does not meet the actual costs of surgical procedures, which contributes to hospitals' financial deficit. The resulting local cost cutting measures in turn constrain capacity and quality. This article examines some limitations in analysing Payment by Results in isolation. Although funding might not meet the costs of surgical services, the proportion of overall costs influenced by clinicians is small, because the bulk of costs are fixed. While on one level this seems frustrating, it can also be viewed as liberating; freeing clinicians from the futility of adjusting clinical practice to attempt to balance the books. They should instead correctly focus on quality of care and patient outcomes.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.bja.2025.08.026

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2025-12-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

135

Pages

1586 - 1590

Total pages

4

Keywords

National Health Service, Payment by Results, cost of surgery, healthcare economics, postoperative complications, Humans, Quality of Health Care, State Medicine, Surgical Procedures, Operative, United Kingdom